Offenses against the Wildlife Conservation and Protection Act
Plaintiff sued the defendant for the confession. The fact is that on May 6, 2060 at the time of the defendant's trade and in possession for sale, one monkey, one of the monkeys, or two red-throated boars, and 25 or 25 cubs. Wildlife protection is not allowed. This is a violation of the law. The incident happened at Klong Nua district, Hat Yai district, Songkhla province. The defendant was arrested with wildlife protection and the number of birds. 3 birds are the middle of the treasurer.
Judge that the defendant is guilty under the Wildlife Conservation and Protection Act, BE 2535, Section 19, paragraph one, paragraph 20, paragraph one, 47. The action of a single defendant is guilty of several offenses. Punish wildlife trade. This is the law that has the heaviest penalty. According to the Criminal Code, Section 90, imprisonment for 1 year and a fine of 16,000 baht. Useful to consider. Blame Half offense According to the Penal Code Section 78, 6 months imprisonment and a fine of 8,000 baht, it appears that the defendant had been sentenced to prison. Penalty imprisonment for one year under the Penal Code Section 56. If not paid a fine to be dealt with under the Penal Code Section 29, 30 confiscated by the Central.
Plaintiff sued the defendant for the confession. The fact is that on May 6, 2060 at the time of the defendant's trade and in possession for sale, one monkey, one of the monkeys, or two red-throated boars, and 25 or 25 cubs. Wildlife protection is not allowed. This is a violation of the law. The incident happened at Klong Nua district, Hat Yai district, Songkhla province. The defendant was arrested with wildlife protection and the number of birds. 3 birds are the middle of the treasurer.
ความคิดเห็น
แสดงความคิดเห็น